Understanding and Designing Complex Systems:
Response to
“A framework for optimal high-level descriptions in science and engineering---preliminary report”

James P. Crutchfield
Ryan G. James
Dowman P. Varn

Complexity Sciences Center
Physics Department
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616 and

and

Sarah Marzen

Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience
Physics Department
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720

ABSTRACT: We recount recent history behind building compact models of nonlinear, complex processes and identifying their relevant macroscopic patterns or “macrostates”. We give a synopsis of computational mechanics, predictive rate-distortion theory, and the role of information measures in monitoring model complexity and predictive performance. Computational mechanics provides a method to extract the optimal minimal predictive model for a given process. Rate-distortion theory provides methods for systematically approximating such models. We end by commenting on future prospects for developing a general framework that automatically discovers optimal compact models. As a response to the manuscript cited in the title above, this brief commentary corrects potentially misleading claims about its state space compression method and places it in a broader historical setting.


James P. Crutchfield, Ryan G. James, Sarah Marzen, and Dowman P. Varn, “Understanding and Designing Complex Systems: Response to ‘A framework for optimal high-level descriptions in science and engineering---preliminary report’” (2014).
doi:XXXX/XXXX.
[pdf] 247 KB
Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 14-12-048.
arxiv.org:1412.8520 [cond-mat.stat-mech].